<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Veritas Network &#187; History of Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theveritasnetwork.org/category/history-of-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org</link>
	<description>Gospel :: Church :: Mission :: Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='theveritasnetwork.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://theveritasnetwork.org/osd.xml" title="The Veritas Network" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://theveritasnetwork.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>God is Dead, but a New god Rises in His Place.</title>
		<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/10/god-is-dead-but-a-new-god-rises-in-his-place/</link>
		<comments>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/10/god-is-dead-but-a-new-god-rises-in-his-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nihilism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theveritasnetwork.org/?p=2142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1966 Time Magazine published this cover for all the world to see. The boldness of the lettering set against a black background remarkably parallels the intent of the author of those three little words, Friedrich Nietzsche. I want to explain what he meant by that infamous statement and, more importantly, explain how pluralism has proven [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theveritasnetwork.org&#038;blog=9555507&#038;post=2142&#038;subd=theveritasnetwork&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/10/god-is-dead-but-a-new-god-rises-in-his-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/640b68de2afd8dd67045066f0ac0414b?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Whitney Clayton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://theveritasnetwork.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/471.jpg?w=227" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">47</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epistemology – Big word, simple meaning, vital importance</title>
		<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/03/epistemology-%e2%80%93-big-word-simple-meaning-vital-importance/</link>
		<comments>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/03/epistemology-%e2%80%93-big-word-simple-meaning-vital-importance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Modernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theveritasnetwork.org/?p=2018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are like me then I assume you want to click over to another of your favorite Christian blogs simply to avoid the rather frightening sesquipedalianism plastered across the title of this post. It is a big, unfamiliar word, but it need not scare you. Much like the overlong word used in the first [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theveritasnetwork.org&#038;blog=9555507&#038;post=2018&#038;subd=theveritasnetwork&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2010/08/03/epistemology-%e2%80%93-big-word-simple-meaning-vital-importance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/640b68de2afd8dd67045066f0ac0414b?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Whitney Clayton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://theveritasnetwork.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/the-thinker1.jpg?w=213" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">the-thinker1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>God&#8217;s Existence: The Cosmological Argument</title>
		<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/21/gods-existence-the-cosmological-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/21/gods-existence-the-cosmological-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God&#039;s Existence: Classical Arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theveritasnetwork.org/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does our study of the universe point to a creator? The Cosmological argument answers that modern astronomy, which posits the Big Bang Theory as the explanation of the beginning of the universe, does indeed point to a creator. Astrophysics at the highest level has long since accepted that the universe is expanding, and this expansion [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theveritasnetwork.org&#038;blog=9555507&#038;post=282&#038;subd=theveritasnetwork&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/21/gods-existence-the-cosmological-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/640b68de2afd8dd67045066f0ac0414b?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Whitney Clayton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>God&#8217;s Existence: The Ontological Argument</title>
		<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/10/gods-existence-the-ontological-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/10/gods-existence-the-ontological-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Whitney Clayton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God&#039;s Existence: Classical Arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theveritasnetwork.org/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of the four classical arguments for the existence of God, the ontological argument is the most questioned and least understood. Ontology is the study of the nature of being, or existence. According to definition, the ontological argument is an argument for God’s existence based upon the nature of his existence. Within the bounds of the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theveritasnetwork.org&#038;blog=9555507&#038;post=242&#038;subd=theveritasnetwork&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/12/10/gods-existence-the-ontological-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/640b68de2afd8dd67045066f0ac0414b?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Whitney Clayton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Scientific Method &amp; Metaphysical Presuppositions</title>
		<link>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/09/22/the-scientific-method-metaphysical-presuppositions/</link>
		<comments>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/09/22/the-scientific-method-metaphysical-presuppositions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Gibson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agnosticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nihilism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Method, The]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theveritasnetwork.org/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the close of the 18th Century, we began to see a new form of philosophy begin to shape.  Scientific questions were then a form of the current metaphysical branch of philosophy, known as natural philosophy, which sought answers through empirical knowledge (epistemology).  With the development of modern science and the birth of the scientific [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=theveritasnetwork.org&#038;blog=9555507&#038;post=45&#038;subd=theveritasnetwork&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theveritasnetwork.org/2009/09/22/the-scientific-method-metaphysical-presuppositions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d0e45a88e73622632f665a3a99ce913c?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Greg Gibson</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
